Legal Opinion

Lindsay v. MacK

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 1935No. Civ. 1165PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to recover $1666.66 and the interest which they had paid to secure the reconveyance to them of property which they had sold to J. A. Mack and wife. This property was encumbered by a deed of trust which had been executed by plaintiffs. George S. Graves was not served and did not appear in the action. Therefore, we will refer to J. A. Mack as the defendant. Judgment went for defendant and plaintiffs have appealed.

Plaintiffs were owners of acreage property near Lakeside in San Diego County. They entered into negotiations for the sale of this property to defendant…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Sivers v. SiversCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Kenney v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. White v. SchaderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Duff v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Simmons v. California Institute of TechnologyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Lacy Manufacturing Co. v. Gold Crown Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Stockburger v. DolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. American Industrial Sales Corp. v. Airscope, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Mangini v. Wolfschmidt, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API