Lacy Manufacturing Co. v. Gold Crown Mining Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Plaintiff instituted this action to recover the balance due upon a contract and for extra labor performed and materials used in the dismantling, removal, and reconstruction of a mining mill and equipment for defendant which operated certain mining properties in San Bernardino County. The controversy revolves primarily about the extra charges.
In early September, 1938, the officers of the two corporations negotiated with a view to contracting for the removal of defendant’s milling plant from location K to a new location some six miles distant, hereafter referred to as location Y. The removal…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hansen v. CovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Pearsall v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Oil Co. v. Van EttenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- California Press Manufacturing Co. v. Stafford Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Hendy v. MarchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Malmstrom v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Zelayeta v. Pacific Greyhound Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- Chesapeake Industries, Inc. v. Togova Entreprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Risley v. LenwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.