White v. Schader
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
The parties herein had exchanged two pieces of real estate, each subject to mortgage. The mortgage upon the property of the plaintiff was afterward foreclosed by the mortgagee and sold -'in satisfaction thereof, leaving a deficiency of $2,264.90. The mortgagee thereupon brought suit against the plaintiff for the amount of the deficiency and the plaintiff in turn brought suit against the defendants, alleging that the defendants in the transaction for the exchange of properties had assumed and agreed to pay the mortgage and were therefore liable to him for such deficiency. Subsequent to the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Johnson v. ElmenTexas Supreme Court · 1900
- McDill v. GunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Kreling v. KrelingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- State ex rel. Winston v. MorrisonWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Herrin v. AbbeSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Silva v. Providence Hospital of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- University of Richmond v. StoneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
- Fuller v. McCallum & Robinson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
- Lindsay v. MacKCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Peterson v. HeringtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.