Legal Opinion

American Industrial Sales Corp. v. Airscope, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1955No. L. A. 23503PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Defendant appeals from an order denying its motion to discharge an attachment. The action in which the attachment was issued was brought to recover money due under a written contract made in the state of Florida. The contract was silent as to the place of payment, and the trial court admitted parol evidence to determine the place of payment. Defendant contends that this was improper, and that in the absence of a provision in the written contract indicating that the money was “payable in this state” (Code Civ. Proc., § 537), the attachment was illegally issued. Neither the statute nor general…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Walters v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Sivers v. SiversCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Gibson v. De La Salle InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Buckner v. A. Leon & Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Stockburger v. DolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Bruce v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Schwartz v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Mangini v. Wolfschmidt, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API