Legal Opinion

Stockburger v. Dolan

California Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1939No. L. A. 17151; L. A. 17150PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

In two actions which were consolidated for trial in the superior court and are presented together upon appeal, the court is called upon to determine the rights of lessors of land to rental under an oil and gas lease.

The litigation between the parties commenced when Francis H. Dolan and his wife sued to recover delay rental in the sum of $12,000 alleged to be due under a lease entered into by them with R. R. Stockburger as lessee. Thereafter, Mr. Stockburger filed an action against the Dolans to recover $5,000 paid by him upon the execution of the lease. His suit was brought upon the theory…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Buckner v. A. Leon & Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Greathouse v. DalenoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  3. Gardiner v. BurketCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Grace v. CroningerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. Lindsay v. MacKCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Simmons v. California Institute of TechnologyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Ellis v. KlaffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Gibson v. De La Salle InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. McNally v. MoserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API