Legal Opinion
Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Falvey
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 23, 1885No. 12,203PublishedCited by 129 opinions
From the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The appellee’s complaint alleges that she was received as a passenger on one of the appellant’s trains and was injured in a collision caused by the negligence of the ap~ pellant’s servants.
The first question in logical order arises upon the rulings made on the admission of the testimony of Dr. R. M. O’Ferrall. "We are satisfied that the appellant is not in a situation to successfully complain of these rulings, for it obtained all it properly asked upon this subject. This we say for the reason that the appellee consented that the appellant’s motion to strike out the testimony might be…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Ehrgott v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Goodwin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Kellogg v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by129 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- City of South Bend v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- City of Fort Wayne v. CoombsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- City of Teree Haute v. HudnutIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.