Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Wood
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Washington Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The material facts stated in the appellee’s *546complaint are these: On the 21st day of October, 1882, theappellee purchased a ticket and entered one of the appellant’s passenger trains. The ticket entitled her to a passage from. Salem to Campbellsburg. At the place of her destination the appellants failed and refused to stop the train a sufficient-length of time to enable her to leave it, but, having stopped, the train, the conductor who had charge tliei’eof, before the plaintiff had sufficient time to get safely off the cars and while the plaintiff was standing on the platform of the cars,,…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Ehrgott v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Lake v. Atlantic WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Commonwealth v. SturtivantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Goodwin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- City of South Bend v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Carrico v. West Virginia Cent. & P. R'y Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
- Springer v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Denver & R. G. R. v. RodderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.