Indiana Car Co. v. Parker
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Henty Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The complaint of the appellee alleges that he was employed by the appellant; that while engaged in the discharge of the duties of his employment, he received an injury, and that this injury was caused by the fault and negligence of the appellant in providing unsafe and defective machinery.
In a very able and elaborate brief, counsel for appellant argue that the appellee is not entitled to recover because the negligence which caused the injury was that of a fellow servant, the foreman of the shop in which the appellee was employed ; and that for such negligence the employer is not liable.
*183We…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Wabash Railway Co. v. McDanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Flike v. . Boston and Albany R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Crispin v. . BabbittNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Ford v. Fitchburg RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by142 opinions
- Pullman Palace Car Co. v. LaackIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Faris v. HobergIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.