City of Teree Haute v. Hudnut
Indiana Supreme Court
From tlie Vigo Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The complaint of the appellees seeks to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the municipal authorities in constructing and maintaining sewers.
One of the principal questions argued by counsel arises on the ruling excluding evidence offered by the appellant. The purpose of appellant in offering this evidence was to prove that the defect in the system of sewers was in the p|am»r and not in the work of executing it, and that the defect was not *544the result of negligence, but of an error of judgment. It has long been the law in this State that a municipal…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Griffin v. . ColverNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Barnes v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Allison v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Isenhour v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Parker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Johnson v. CulverIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Davidson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Lever Bros. Co. v. Atlas Assur. Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.