Legal Opinion

Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. Buck

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1884No. 11,104PublishedCited by 111 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

On the night of December 9th, 1881, the appellee’s intestate, Andrew J. Buck, took passage on one of the appellant’s passenger trains at the town of Darlington for the station of Sugar Creek, not far distant. Both these places were regular stations of the company, at which passengers were received and discharged, and the train on which the deceased took passage stopped at Sugar Creek. About the time the train usually arrived at this station, and at the place where the signal -whistle for the station was usually sounded, the engineer caused the customary signal to be given, and applied the…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Stokes v. SaltonstallSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  3. Scheffer v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Ryan v. . New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  5. Brown v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1882

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. Pullman Palace Car Co. v. LaackIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Wallace v. LudwigMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Davis v. Mercer Lumber Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1905

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API