Legal Opinion

City of South Bend v. Turner

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1901No. 18,929PublishedCited by 89 opinions

From the Marshall Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

Suit by appellee to recover damages for ‘ personal injuries. The facts set forth in the complaint are substantially as follows: On the 8th day of April, 1894, the appellants, being,' respectively, a municipal and private corporation, were engaged in the construction of a tfunlc sewer for the defendant city through one of its public streets, declining northward and terminating in St. Joseph river'; that at a point near its terminus the appellants constructed a manhole, circular in form, and two and one-half feet in diameter, near the center of a public street' crossing, thus constituting a…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Consolidated Stone Co. v. SummitIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. DowningCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Austin & Northwestern Railroad v. CluckTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Johnston v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Indianapolis & Greenfield Rapid Transit Co. v. ForemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1904

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API