Legal Opinion

North Confidence Mining & Development Co. v. Fitch

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1922No. Civ. No. 2436PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

This action was instituted to cancel a promissory note and mortgage for the sum of $9,439.04 purporting to have been given by the plaintiff to defendant Fitch. The court found the note to be valid to the extent of $1,787.89 and enjoined the defendants “from collecting any greater amount thereon,” and adjudged the mortgage to be a lien on the lands described therein “to the extent of said sum of $1,787.89 with interest.” From this judgment both the plaintiff and the defendants prosecute separate appeals.

Plaintiff corporation was organized with a capital stock of $75,000 divided into 75,000…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pacific Vinegar & Pickle Works v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Wittenbrock v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Curtin v. Salmon River Hydraulic Gold Mining & Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  4. O'Conner Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Coosa Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  5. Graves v. Mono Lake Hydraulic Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. WattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Gordon Campbell Petroleum Co. v. Gordon Campbell-Kevin SyndicateMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Stanton v. Occidental Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Alward v. Broadway Gold Min. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  5. North Confidence Mining & Development Co. v. FitchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API