North Confidence Mining & Development Co. v. Fitch
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
This action was instituted to cancel a promissory note and mortgage for the sum of $9,439.04 purporting to have been given by the plaintiff to defendant Fitch. The court found the note to be valid to the extent of $1,787.89 and enjoined the defendants “from collecting any greater amount thereon,” and adjudged the mortgage to be a lien on the lands described therein “to the extent of said sum of $1,787.89 with interest.” From this judgment both the plaintiff and the defendants prosecute separate appeals.
Plaintiff corporation was organized with a capital stock of $75,000 divided into 75,000…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pacific Vinegar & Pickle Works v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Wittenbrock v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Curtin v. Salmon River Hydraulic Gold Mining & Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- O'Conner Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Coosa Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Graves v. Mono Lake Hydraulic Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. WattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Gordon Campbell Petroleum Co. v. Gordon Campbell-Kevin SyndicateMontana Supreme Court · 1926
- Stanton v. Occidental Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Alward v. Broadway Gold Min. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
- North Confidence Mining & Development Co. v. FitchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922