Alward v. Broadway Gold Min. Co.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The execution of the note sued upon was expressly forbidden by the by-laws of the corporation, except on the authority of the board of directors. It is conceded that the note in suit was executed without such authority and that the plaintiff took the note subject to all defenses existing against the original payee. It follows, therefore, that the note is invalid and unenforceable unless it has been shown that its unauthorized execution was subsequently expressly or impliedly ratified. (14a C.J., pp. 373-382; Spelman v. Gold Min. Co., 26 Mont. 76, 66 P. 597, 91 Am. St. Rep. 402, 55 L.R.A. 640;…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Western National Bank v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Jones v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Higgins v. LansinghIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Cahall v. LoflandCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1921
- Farwell v. Pyle-National Electric Headlight Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Keneco v. CantrellMontana Supreme Court · 1977
- State ex rel. Howeth v. D. A. Davidson & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1973
- Johnson v. KaiserMontana Supreme Court · 1937
- Howeth v. D.A. Davidson Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1973