Wittenbrock v. Parker
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tehama County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
was an action by Henry Witte trbrock, as plaintiff, to have a satisfaction of a mortgage *97set aside and canceled, and to foreclose said mortgage which was executed by the defendant, John A. Parker. Defendants Bithell and Harlow were made defendants, set up mortgages in their favor, which, by the decree of the court, were adjudged valid and subsisting against the defendant, Parker, and the liens thereof prior to the lien of plaintiff's mortgage.
Plaintiff appeals from the decree, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
The following facts illustrate the important question in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- The Distilled SpiritsSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Fulton Bank v. New-York & Sharon Canal Co.New York Court of Chancery · 1833
- Weisser v. . DenisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Stanley v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Watson v. SutroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Drury v. FrankeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Utah Construction Co. v. Western Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Lawall v. GromanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Freeman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.