North Confidence Mining & Development Co. v. Fitch
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
The defendants appeal from the judgment herein adjudging that a certain promissory note and mortgage in favor of defendant Fitch for $9,439.04 are invalid for any amount in excess of $1,787.89 and enjoining the defendants from collecting any greater sum upon said note. The facts are fully set forth in the opinion this day filed deciding plaintiff’s appeal (ante, p. 329 [208 Pac. 328]) from the judgment holding the note and mortgage valid to the extent of $1,787.89.
Appellants contend that the plaintiff is not entitled to a judgment of cancellation because there is neither allegation nor proof…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Turner v. MarkhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- San Jose Safe Deposit Bank of Savings v. Bank of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Horton v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- North Confidence Mining & Development Co. v. FitchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Mendocino County v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Johnson v. PfrimmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944