Legal Opinion

North Confidence Mining & Development Co. v. Fitch

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1922No. Civ. No. 2442PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The defendants appeal from the judgment herein adjudging that a certain promissory note and mortgage in favor of defendant Fitch for $9,439.04 are invalid for any amount in excess of $1,787.89 and enjoining the defendants from collecting any greater sum upon said note. The facts are fully set forth in the opinion this day filed deciding plaintiff’s appeal (ante, p. 329 [208 Pac. 328]) from the judgment holding the note and mortgage valid to the extent of $1,787.89.

Appellants contend that the plaintiff is not entitled to a judgment of cancellation because there is neither allegation nor proof…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Turner v. MarkhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. San Jose Safe Deposit Bank of Savings v. Bank of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Horton v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. North Confidence Mining & Development Co. v. FitchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. Mendocino County v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. PfrimmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API