Legal Opinion

Gustafson v. Cullen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1930No. 22065. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

Appellant, who was plaintiff below, has appealed from a judgment of dismissal entered after the sustaining of a demurrer to his complaint and his election to stand on his complaint.

The complaint, omitting formal averments, and somewhat freely interpreted, may for present purposes he summarized as follows:

It alleges that respondent W. E. Cullen was on May 7, 1924, the president of a certain mining corporation organized under the laws of the state of Montana and owning or having some interest in a mining property in that state; that, at the time mentioned, respondent Cullen represented to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Heywood v. Northern Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Byram v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Soderberg v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Bosworth v. WolfeWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Rennebohm v. RennebohmWashington Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kilbourne v. KilbourneWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. King County v. OdmanWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Henriod v. HenriodWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Johnson v. Shell Oil Co. of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Johnson v. Shell Oil Co. of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API