Legal Opinion
Kilbourne v. Kilbourne
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 21, 1930No. 22037. En BancPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHoloomb, J.
This is an action for damages for fraud and deceit stated in two counts.
On trial to the court and a jury, at the close of the evidence on behalf of appellant, a challenge interposed by respondent to the sufficiency of the evidence on several grounds was sustained by the court on the ground that both causes of action were barred by the.statute of limitations. A motion for a new trial was overruled and a judgment of dismissal entered.
An outline of the nature of the case may be had from a brief summary of the pleadings.
During the month of September, 1928, Prank H. Kilbourne died testate at…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Wagner v. LawWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Cornell v. EdsenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Morgan v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Conaway v. Co-Operative HomebuildersWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Byram v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1926
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. Diffie H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. Carpenter H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. McInnisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- In Re Krause's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Milton E. Dam and Everett S. Dam, Co-Partners Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Dam Brothers v. General Electric Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- State v. MahmoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- Walker v. SiegWashington Supreme Court · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.