Legal Opinion

Byram v. Thurston County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1926No. 20195. Department OnePublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This appeal is from a judgment for the recovery of taxes for the year 1924, paid under protest by respondents in 1925. The facts found by the trial court are, in substance, these:

In 1924 the operating properties of the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company in Washington, were assessed by the director of taxation, acting through the division of taxation, at $45,707,922, and an assessment roll duly prepared was returned to the state equalization committee, which convened according to law September 2, 1926.

On August 11, 1926, prior to the return of the taxation roll to the equalization…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ward v. Board of Commr's of Love Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. State ex rel. Barnard v. Board of EducationWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. State ex rel. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Collins v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Lewis v. BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1898

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Chandler v. Washington Toll Bridge AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Puget Sound Alumni of Kappa Sigma, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Carrillo v. City of Ocean ShoresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. Carrillo v. City of Ocean ShoresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. Columbia Steel Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1949

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API