Legal Opinion

Heywood v. Northern Assurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 30, 1916No. Nos. 19,760—(152)PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $433.59 upon two promissory notes. The case was tried before Dickinson, J., who made findings and ordered judgment for the amount demanded. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.

Thomas Dunn, a life insurance solicitor in the employ of defendant, a Michigan corporation, secured two policies of insurance in Michigan, took notes running to himself for the first premium, and paid the defendant the amount of the premium, less his commission. Then he sold the notes to plaintiff. Because of some disagreement with Dunn, defendant demanded that the notes be paid to it, and the makers did pay the amount thereof to defendant. In one case defendant guaranteed to protect the payor against loss arising from such payment. The money should have been paid to plaintiff. Defendant had…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Roberts v. . ElyNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Brand v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  3. Walker v. ConantMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Todd v. BettingenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  5. Bates-Farley Savings Bank v. DismukesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Cady v. BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Jasper School District v. GormleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  3. Town of Balkan v. Village of BuhlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Caskie v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Fargo Foundry Co. v. Village of CallawaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API