Legal Opinion

Henriod v. Henriod

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1939No. 27403. Department TwoPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

Plaintiff instituted this action for an accounting and to recover the value of personal property claimed to have been concealed by her husband, now deceased, when they made a property settlement just prior to the time she secured a divorce from him.

In her complaint, plaintiff alleged that she and Henry D. Henriod were married November 1,1892, and thereafter were wife and husband until May 25, 1926, at which time they were divorced by decree of the Spokane county superior court; that April 19, 1937, Henry D. Henriod died testate and his will was admitted to probate; that the defendant…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Boykin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  2. Wagner v. LawWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Cornell v. EdsenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Deering v. HolcombWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Corbaley v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1937

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. ShonubiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  2. Todorovic v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Bay City Lumber Co. v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Opp v. BoggsMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Griffin v. Cascade Theatres Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API