Legal Opinion

Rennebohm v. Rennebohm

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1929No. 21881. Department OnePublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

Respondent instituted this action to quiet his title to certain real estate situated in Seattle, King county. The defendants, appellants here, are the sons of his deceased wife; the two first named by a former marriage, and the last named being the fruit of the marriage between the respondent and the deceased wife. The complaint, in addition to the usual allegations, sets up that the defendants have caused to be recorded in the office of the county auditor an instrument in writing which recites that respondent acquired record title to the property in question, as distributee of the estate of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Farrell v. MentzerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Rozell v. VansyckleWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Arnold v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Northwestern & Pacific Hypotheek Bank v. RidpathWashington Supreme Court · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Beckendorf v. BeckendorfWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Kausky v. KostenWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Kilbourne v. KilbourneWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. In re the Estate of WimberleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. City of Tacoma v. NymanWashington Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API