Legal Opinion

Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Vaszil

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 11, 2006No. SC 17493PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KATZ, J.

The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether the Appellate Court properly determined that the residential lease in question created a right of subro-gation and a consequent obligation by the tenant to the landlord’s insurance company for a fire loss that the tenant allegedly had caused to the landlord’s apartment building. The plaintiff, the Middlesex Mutual Assurance Company, brought this action in subrogation of the right of its insured, Hunting Lodge Partners, LLC (Hunting), to compensation from the defendants Brian Vaszil and Robert Vaszil.1 The trial court rendered…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Peter-Michael, Inc. v. Sea Shell AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Sutton v. JondahlCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. Cantonbury Heights Condominium Ass'n v. Local Land Development, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  4. Levine v. Advest, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. Dilullo v. JosephSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Bristol v. Ocean State Job Lot Stores of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. Young v. VlahosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  3. Amica Mut. Ins. Co. v. MuldowneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  4. Amica Mutual Ins. Co. v. MuldowneyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  5. David Caron Chrysler v. Goodhall's, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API