Paul Revere Life Insurance v. Pastena
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendant appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) determined that there were no genuine issues of material fact and relied on certain evidence in rendering summary judgment and (2) granted the remedy of rescission. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.1
The following facts are relevant to the resolution of this appeal. In February, 1994, the defendant, Janis A. Pastena, a surgeon, applied for a surgeon specific disability income insurance policy with the plaintiff,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Home Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Batick v. SeymourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- D.H.R. Construction Co. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Carriage Lane AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Christian v. GouldinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Rund v. MelilloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Nash v. StevensConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Briggs v. BriggsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Petrucelli v. PalmerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.