Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Mutual Communications Associates, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 23, 2001No. AC 20525PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPEAR, J.
The defendants Jerome G. Terracino and Guardian Systems, Inc. (Guardian), appeal from the deficiency judgment rendered against them and their codefendants, Mutual Communications Associates, Inc. (Mutual), Richard T. DeMarsico and Robert Rossman (Rossman), subsequent to a judgment of foreclosure. The defendants1 claim that the court improperly (1) concluded that there was insufficient evidence to find that Rossman’s attorney was acting as Rossman’s agent when he purchased a promissory note and assigned it to a company controlled by Rossman’s wife, (2) failed to apply the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Botticello v. StefanoviczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Hallas v. Boehmke & Dobosz, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Bolmer v. KocetConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Davies v. General Tours, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Cyclone Fence Co. v. McAvineySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. IralaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Terracino v. Fairway Asset Management, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Sunrise Healthcare Corp. v. AzarigianConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Mackie v. HullConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Mutual Communications Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.