Legal Opinion
Santana v. City of Hartford
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 21, 2006No. AC 25994PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiff, Alberto Santana, appeals from the judgment rendered in two consolidated actions. In the first action, the plaintiff unsuccessfully sought indemnification pursuant to General Statutes § 53-39a. In the second action, the trial court concluded that the plaintiff was not entitled to reinstatement as a Hartford police officer following the judgment of acquittal on underlying criminal charges. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) found that the crimes of which he was acquitted were not allegedly committed in the course of his duty as a…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilbert v. HomarSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MallenSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Biro v. MatzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Wooldridge v. Greene CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- D'Urso v. LyonsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Phillips v. PhillipsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Santana v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.