Legal Opinion
Bijur v. Bijur
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 7, 2003No. AC 22428PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*754 Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The defendant, Peter I. Bijur, appeals from the judgment of the trial court issuing certain postjudgment orders sought by the plaintiff, Anne M. Bijur, in her postjudgment motion for contempt and order.1 On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly ordered him to resume making alimony payments on the basis of a misinterpretation of the language in article IV2 of the parties’ separation agreement *755(agreement). In the alternative, the defendant claims that even if the court properly interpreted the language of article IV, a retirement plan distribution was made…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Boggs v. BoggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Barnard v. BarnardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- United Illuminating Co. v. Wisvest-Connecticut, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Lopinto v. HainesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Bortner v. Town of WoodbridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Isham v. IshamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Santana v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Feen v. New England Benefit Companies, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Quasius v. QuasiusConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Connecticut Properties Tri-Town Plaza, LLC v. Seymour Cinema, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.