Legal Opinion

Carter v. Carter

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 1942No. Civ. 12116PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J. pro tem.

On May 16, 1941, respondent herein caused a writ of execution to be levied upon a bank account standing in the names of appellants, who are husband and wife. The writ of execution was issued upon a judgment against appellant husband. Appellant husband filed an affidavit claiming the sum of $251.87 to be exempt from execution under section 690.11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Appellant wife filed a third party claim alleging title to one-half of the amount in the bank account. The two matters were heard together and from an order denying the claim of exemption and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lefrooth v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Llewellyn Iron Works v. Abbott Kidney Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Dixon Lumber Co. v. PeacockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Adams v. PratherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Bertozzi v. SwisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Mejia v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Sourcecorp, Inc. v. ShillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Perfection Paint Products v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Heffernan v. Bennett & ArmourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API