Legal Opinion

Mejia v. Reed

California Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 2003No. S106586PublishedCited by 161 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

Danilo Reed (Husband) had an extramarital relationship with plaintiff Rhina Mejia that led to the birth of a child. In a later divorce proceeding, Husband and Violeta Reed (Wife) entered into a marital settlement agreement (MSA) under which Husband transferred all his interest in jointly held real property to Wife. Plaintiff claimed that the purpose of this transfer was to prevent her from collecting child support, and she asked the court to impose a lien on the real property. The trial court rejected her contentions and entered summary judgment for Husband.

The Court of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Tripp v. SwoapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Adams v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by161 opinions

  1. In Re DannenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. MW Erectors, Inc. v. Niederhauser Ornamental & Metal Works Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
  3. MacIsaac v. Waste Management Collection & Recycling, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Coachella Valley Mosquito & Vector Control District v. California Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Pacific Palisades Bowl Mobile Estates, LLC v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012

156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API