Legal Opinion
Dixon Lumber Co. v. Peacock
California Supreme Court
Decided February 21, 1933No. Docket No. Sac. 4592PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
This action was commenced by the plaintiff to set aside conveyances of certain property to the defendant by her husband, and the appeal is from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff.
The facts necessary to an understanding of the controversy are as follows: Appellant and - her husband had been married thirty-seven years prior to the divorce which will shortly be mentioned. Some time before the conveyances of the property, according to the testimony of appellant, her husband was living with another woman. They separated February 27, 1928, although they had not lived together for a long…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Murray v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Blethen v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- New York Life Insurance v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Parks v. WorthingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1908
- Washburn v. HuntingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Grimm v. GrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Occidental Life Insurance v. PowersWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Murphy v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Travelers Insurance v. FancherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Sandra Joanne Murphy, Plaintiff-Third Party Defendant-Appellant-Cross v. The Travelers Insurance Company, Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Barbara A. Murphy, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Minors Lee S. Murphy, Etc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.