Legal Opinion

Randone v. Appellate Department

California Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1971No. Sac. 7885PublishedCited by 177 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

For more than a century California creditors have enjoyed the benefits of a variety of summary prejudgment remedies, and, until recently, the propriety of such procedures has gone largely unchallenged. In June 1969, however, the United States Supreme Court in Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. (1969) 395 U.S. 337 [23 L.Ed.2d 349, 89 S.Ct. 1820], concluded that a Wisconsin prejudgment wage garnishment statute violated a debtor’s right to procedural due process, by sanctioning the “taking” of his property without affording him prior notice and hearing. The force of the…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by177 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. In Re OlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Mills v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

172 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API