Legal Opinion

City of Marion v. Schoenwald

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2001No. NonePublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] To keep excessive numbers of large dogs from becoming a public nuisance, the City of Marion passed an ordinance that, among other things, limited households to four dogs, only two of which could weigh over 25 pounds. When the ordinance was challenged in court, the weight restriction was struck down. We reverse that ruling. South Dakota law permits municipalities broad power to regulate the keeping of dogs, and thus the weight limitation included in the City’s comprehensive pet ordinance was within its authority.

A

[¶ 2.] Marion city officials heard numerous complaints…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Faircloth v. Raven Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Tipton v. Town of TaborSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Ericksen v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  4. City of St. Paul v. DalsinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. Garcia v. Village of TijerasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of Pierre v. BlackwellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. FIFTEEN IMPOUNDED CATSSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Pennington County v. State ex rel. Unified Judicial SystemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Patterson v. LinnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Law v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API