Legal Opinion
Law v. City of Sioux Falls
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 21, 2011No. 25897PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KONENEAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] The City of Sioux Falls enacted a zoning ordinance controlling the location of new on-sale alcoholic beverage businesses seeking to place video lottery machines in their establishments. In a declaratory action, the circuit court ruled that the City exceeded its authority when it enacted the ordinance. The court concluded that South Dakota’s constitutional and statutory scheme indicated that the State intended to fully occupy the field of video lottery, to the exclusion of municipal regulation. We affirm.
Background
[¶2.] On February 8, 2007, Rick Law filed an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fogle v. H & G Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Sarasota Alliance for Fair Elections, Inc. v. BrowningSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- City of Rapid City v. RenschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
- In Re Appeal From Decision of Yankton County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- PICKEREL LAKE v. DAY COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTASouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Parris v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Nichols v. City of MitchellDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2012
- City of Rapid City v. SchaubSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020