Legal Opinion
Pennington County v. State ex rel. Unified Judicial System
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 27, 2002No. 21910PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GORS, Acting Justice.
[¶ 1.] Pennington County sued the State of South Dakota Unified Judicial System (State) for a judgment declaring that the county did not have to provide space for court services in the courthouse or that the State had to pay for the space. The trial court ruled in favor of the State and the county filed this appeal. We vacate the judgment and dismiss the action.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Pennington County, South Dakota, is the second most populous county in the state. It has a large courthouse which more than doubled in size in 1991 to meet the expanding need for courtrooms, the clerk…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Frank S. Dorman v. Michael HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- City of New York v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- County of Albany v. . HookerNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Danforth v. City of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Reaser v. ReaserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Dan Nelson, Automotive, Inc. v. VikenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Schafer v. DEUEL COUNTY BD. OF COM'RS.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Elliott v. Board of County CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Dakota Systems, Inc. v. VikenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.