Legal Opinion
City of St. Paul v. Dalsin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 22, 1955No. 36,593PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Matson, Justice.
Defendant appeals from a municipal court judgment convicting him of conducting his business as a roofer without having a license for performing warm air heating, ventilation, and general sheet metal work as required by an ordinance of the city of St. Paul.
Defendant is a partner of the firm of John A. Dalsin & Son whose place of business is located in Minneapolis. On August 5, 1954, in the course of placing a roof on the Minnesota Veterans Service Buiiding, a sheet metal worker, employed by the Dalsin firm, was installing copper flashings on such roof. The use of copper…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Soon Hing v. CrowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- State Bd. of Equalization of Cal. v. Young's Market Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Travis v. Yale & Towne Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Mahoney v. Joseph Triner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Mammenga v. State Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State by Spannaus v. Century Camera, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Pearce v. Village of EdinaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- In Re BaileyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Ri-Mel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.