Tipton v. Town of Tabor
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1] We are again faced with the question whether city and county officials owed a “special duty” to protect four-year-old Crystal Tipton who was severely mauled when she strayed into an nearby yard and approached a cage holding two wolfdog hybrids. Following remand in the earlier appeal, the circuit court, applying our new standard, granted summary judgment, concluding as a matter of law no special duty affixed. Although existence of a special duty is a question of law, ordinarily breach of duty is a question of fact for a jury. Nonetheless, we conclude summary judgment…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Cuffy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- De Long v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Bordeaux v. Shannon County SchoolsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Walther v. KPKA Meadowlands Ltd. PartnershipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Wallace v. Ohio Department of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- American Family Insurance Group v. RobnikSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.