Legal Opinion

Tipton v. Town of Tabor

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1997No. 19631PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1] We are again faced with the question whether city and county officials owed a “special duty” to protect four-year-old Crystal Tipton who was severely mauled when she strayed into an nearby yard and approached a cage holding two wolfdog hybrids. Following remand in the earlier appeal, the circuit court, applying our new standard, granted summary judgment, concluding as a matter of law no special duty affixed. Although existence of a special duty is a question of law, ordinarily breach of duty is a question of fact for a jury. Nonetheless, we conclude summary judgment…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Cuffy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  5. De Long v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Bordeaux v. Shannon County SchoolsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Walther v. KPKA Meadowlands Ltd. PartnershipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Wallace v. Ohio Department of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. American Family Insurance Group v. RobnikSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API