Faircloth v. Raven Industries, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKonenkamp, Justice
[¶ 1.] In this workers’ compensation appeal, we must decide which of two statutes of limitations applies to a claim. The employer contends that the two-year limitation in SDCL 62-7-35 pertains because the employer gave written notice denying the claim. The employee, on the other hand, contends that the three-year period in SDCL 62-7-35.1 applies because the employer previously provided benefits to the employee. The Department of Labor ruled that the claim was barred under the two-year statute of limitations. On appeal, the circuit court reversed, applying the three-year statute. We conclude…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Posadas v. National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Simpson v. TobinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Meyerink v. Northwestern Public Service Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Delano v. PetteysSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Peterson, Ex Rel. Peterson v. BurnsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Pitt-Hart v. Sanford USD Medical CenterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Double Diamond Construction v. Farmers Cooperative Elevator Ass'n of BeresfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Magner v. BrinkmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Peters v. Great Western Bank, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.