Legal Opinion

City of Pierre v. Blackwell

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 2001No. NonePublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Henry Blackwell, Sr. (Blackwell) is the owner of a dog declared by an animal control officer to be “dangerous” pursuant to Pierre City Ordinance § 10-3-111. He was subsequently convicted under Pierre City Ordinance § 10-3-117, which makes it a crime to violate § 10-3-111. Blackwell challenges the conviction on the basis that the ordinances themselves are unconstitutional and that his constitutional right to procedural due process has been violated. We hold the ordinances to be constitutional but reverse and remand for determination on the factual issue of the dog’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Sentell v. New Orleans & Carrollton R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Appeal of SchrammSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Hollander v. Douglas CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. City of Marion v. SchoenwaldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. I-90 TRUCK HAVEN SERVICES, INC.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Daily v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. FIFTEEN IMPOUNDED CATSSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. FrazierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. HolwaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API