City of Pierre v. Blackwell
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Henry Blackwell, Sr. (Blackwell) is the owner of a dog declared by an animal control officer to be “dangerous” pursuant to Pierre City Ordinance § 10-3-111. He was subsequently convicted under Pierre City Ordinance § 10-3-117, which makes it a crime to violate § 10-3-111. Blackwell challenges the conviction on the basis that the ordinances themselves are unconstitutional and that his constitutional right to procedural due process has been violated. We hold the ordinances to be constitutional but reverse and remand for determination on the factual issue of the dog’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sentell v. New Orleans & Carrollton R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Appeal of SchrammSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Hollander v. Douglas CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- City of Marion v. SchoenwaldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. I-90 TRUCK HAVEN SERVICES, INC.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Daily v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. FIFTEEN IMPOUNDED CATSSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. FrazierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. HolwaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.