Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. M. T.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1995No. CC 8605-80305; CA A78160; SC S41466PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

In this juvenile delinquency case, we are asked to determine whether a specific “order,” entered by a Multnomah County Juvenile Court referee and granting child a “conditional postponement” of his delinquency hearing, is subject to appeal. The Court of Appeals held that the order had “all the earmarks of a [final] dispositional order pursuant to former ORS 419.507”1 and was, therefore, appealable. State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. M. T., 128 Or App 25, 31, 874 P2d 836 (1994). The Court of Appeals then reversed the referee’s order granting the “conditional postponement” and remanded the matter to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Colby v. LarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Smith v. Multnomah County Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Meyer v. JosephOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In re Marriage of HenryOregon Supreme Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kambury v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In Re AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. S.-Q. K. (In re S.-Q. K.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. Fairbanks v. Bureau of Labor and IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Preble v. Centennial Sch. Dist. No. 287Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API