Preble v. Centennial Sch. Dist. No. 287
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
LANDAU, S. J.
*44*358Held *359The question in this case is which of two statutes of limitations applies to plaintiff's personal injury claim against a public employer. On the one hand, ORS 30.275(9) provides that "[n]otwithstanding any other *** statute providing a limitation on the commencement of an action," a tort action against a public body must be filed within two years after the alleged loss or injury. On the other hand, ORS 656.019(2)(a) provides that, "notwithstanding any other statute of limitation," a claim against an employer-including a public employer-must be filed within 180 days after…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. ShumwayOregon Supreme Court · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burley v. Clackamas Cnty.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Athena v. Pelican Brewing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- City of Portland v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Dement Ranch v. Curry County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Preble v. Centennial School Dist., No. 287Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.