Legal Opinion

Kambury v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2002No. CC 9812-08378; CA A107705; SC S48459PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

This case requires this court to determine which limitations period applies in a civil action seeking damages for the death of a person killed by a defective product. The trial court examined the statute specifying a three-year limitation period for wrongful death actions and the statute providing for a two-year limitation period for product liability actions, and concluded that the two-year period applied. The Court of Appeals analyzed the same statutes and concluded that the three-year period applied. Kambury v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 173 Or App 372, 21 P3d 1089 (2001). We conclude that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Western Helicopter Services, Inc. v. Rogerson Aircraft Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Eldridge v. Eastmoreland General HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Peterson v. TempleOregon Supreme Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Powers v. QuigleyOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Griffith v. BlattOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. DahlOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Kambury v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Sunset Presbyterian Church v. Brockamp & Jaeger, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API