Smith v. Multnomah County Board of Commissioners
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
In this property tax case, plaintiff taxpayer sought a refund, under the general refund statute, ORS 311.806, 1 of taxes imposed and collected in excess of the limits of Article XI, section lib, of the Oregon Constitution (commonly known as “Measure 5”). 2 The Tax Court held that two other statutes, ORS 305.583 and 305.587, 3 provide the exclusive means for obtaining such a refund. On de novo review, we agree and affirm the judgment of the Tax Court.
Plaintiff taxpayer owns real property in the City of Portland. The taxes assessed on that property for the fiscal year 1991-92 included $93.98…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Christensen v. MurphyOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Colby v. LarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- State v. PrestonOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Coalition for Equitable School Funding, Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Strader v. Grange Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Koskela v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. PierpointCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.