Legal Opinion

In re Marriage of Henry

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1986No. D83-0779; CA A30423; SC S31788PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

The issue is whether the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction over an appeal by a party who failed to answer in circuit court although that party concedes that she was personally and properly served with summons in another state. We hold that the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction.

This is a suit by a husband for dissolution of a marriage. The husband’s petition alleged that he had been a resident of and domiciled in Oregon for a period of six months preceding commencement of the suit, thus satisfying the requirement of ORS 107.075(2) for jurisdiction of a suit for dissolution. In addition to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. ClevengerOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Waybrant v. BernsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Trullenger v. ToddOregon Supreme Court · 1873
  4. State of Oregon v. ElliottOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Smith v. Ellendale Mill Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1870

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Boyd v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. M. T.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Department of Human Services v. S. C. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. Rajneesh Foundation International v. McGreerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API