Moschetti v. City of Tucson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
MOLLOY, Chief Judge.
The critical issue in this eminent domain proceeding is whether the trial judge properly refused to permit expert testimony offered by the owner of residential property bordering on a major urban artery concerning the probability of a future rezoning of the land to include commercial uses, and the effect of the prospect of such a rezoning on the market value of the land at the time of taking.
Appellant owns two adjacent lots, irregularly shaped, each having 177 feet of frontage on the south side of Broadway Boulevard in the City of Tucson. There is a house on one lot; the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- City of Austin v. CannizzoTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- State v. ThelbergArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Pima County v. BilbyArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- In Re ForsstromArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- State Highway Commission v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1957
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nashville Housing Authority v. CohenTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- Ada County Highway District v. MagwireIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- City of Phoenix v. WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Miller v. FillerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- City of Tucson v. RicklesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.