Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Miller v. Filler

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1991No. CV-90-0320-SA, CV-90-0319-SAPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORCORAN, Justice.

In this consolidation of two special action petitions, we address whether the trier of fact in a condemnation proceeding may consider the effect of construction delay on a property’s market value when determining severance damages and special benefits. This issue arises in connection with eminent domain proceedings initiated for construction of the Outer Loop Freeway in the Phoenix area. Charles L. Miller, Director of the Arizona Department of Transportation (DOT), filed a special action petition against the respondent judge and several condemnees, asserting that the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Schultz Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. State v. HollisArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Defnet Land & Investment Co. v. State Ex Rel. HermanArizona Supreme Court · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Phoenix v. Leroy's Liquors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  2. Calmat of Arizona v. State Ex Rel. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Dixon v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Town of Paradise Valley v. LaughlinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  5. Pima County v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API