City of Austin v. Cannizzo
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Calvert
The controversy in this condemnation proceeding brought by our petitioner, the City of Austin, for school purposes, relates only to the determination of the damages. The land actually appropriated was a more or less rectangular piece, being 4.57 acres out of a larger tract owned by the respondent-condemnees, John Cannizzo and others, in a southwesterly area of the city, in the angle between the Barton Springs Road on the north and the Fredericksburg Road or South Lamar Boulevard on the east. The 4.57 acres lies immediately south of a 6-acre tract of the City on which is located a relatively…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- State v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Texas Power & Light Co. v. HeringTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- State v. CarpenterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1936
- Long Beach City High School District v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by266 opinions
- Exxon Pipeline Co. v. ZwahrTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Westgate, Ltd. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Amoco Production Co. v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Crosstex North Texas Pipeline, L.P., N/K/A Enlink North Texas Pipeline, Lp v. Andrew Gardiner and Shannon GardinerTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- City of Harlingen v. Estate of SharboneauTexas Supreme Court · 2001
261 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.