Legal Opinion

City of Phoenix v. Wilson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 2001No. CV-00-0149-PRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Justice.

¶ 1 In this eminent domain case, the trial judge permitted the landowners’ expert witness to estimate damages based on his opinion that a portion of the original parcel had a different highest and best use from the rest. Thus, the appraiser testified, the property should be treated as two separate units before the taking, with different valuations given to the 5-acre corner, in which the parcel to be taken was located, and the rest of the parcel. The jury verdict was based on that theory. The court of appeals reversed, holding that the trial judge erred in permitting…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. ThelbergArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. SilveiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. State Ex Rel. Morrison v. Jay Six Cattle Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Defnet Land & Investment Co. v. State Ex Rel. HermanArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Maricopa County v. BarkleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dept of Transportation v. HJ GratholIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Miller Park, L.L.C.Arizona Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State Ex Rel. Mendez v. AMERICAN SUPPORTCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. SALT RIVER PROJ. AGRIC. IMP. AND POWER DIST. v. Miller Park, LLCArizona Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Miller Park, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API