Legal Opinion

Nashville Housing Authority v. Cohen

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1976PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROCK, Justice.

I

This is a condemnation case. The question presented is whether or not the trial judge erred in refusing to charge the jury that, in determining the fair market value of the property, they should consider the effect, if any, of potential rezoning of the property; provided, they should first find that rezoning was a “reasonable probability.”

The trial judge refused a request for special instruction to this effect submitted by the condemnee-respondent, Freda Cohen. The Court of Appeals, in an opinion by Drowota, J., held unanimously that failure to so instruct the jury upon…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. CannizzoTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Alloway v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  3. State Roads Commission v. WarrinerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Hall v. City of West Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  5. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. BancorpSouth Bank, Inc. v. HatchelCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  2. STATE BY COM'R OF TRANSP. v. CaoiliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  3. Love v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Ada County Highway District v. MagwireIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Shelby County v. Mid-South Title Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API