Legal Opinion
In Re Forsstrom
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 1934No. Civil No. 3566PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
This is an original petition in this court on the application of William Forsstrom and Luella B. Forsstrom, his wife, hereinafter called petitioners, for a writ of prohibition forbidding the superior court of Pima county from proceeding with a certain action pending in said court, being No. 15750, between the city of Tucson, a municipal corporation, as plaintiff, and petitioners and various other parties as defendants, which action is for a condemnation of certain easements of ingress and egress belonging to the lands owned by petitioners, to the extent that said easements will be taken by…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Rigney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- McMillen v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Forster v. . ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. ThelbergArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Liddick v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Board of County Com'rs, Lincoln County v. HarrisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation Dist. No. 1 v. WarfordArizona Supreme Court · 1949
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.