Almaden Vineyards Corp. v. Arnerich
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
—From a judgment denying it an injunction the plaintiff has appealed.
The trial court made findings in favor of the defendants. The plaintiff attacks some of the findings and some of the rulings on the exclusion of evidence. Before proceeding the following facts should be stated as forming the controversy between the parties. In March, 1844, a Mexican grant, San Juan Bautisto Rancho, was executed in favor of Jose Augustin Narvaez. That rancho lies in a westerly direction from San Jose and not far distant. Later a patent was issued to the grantee. To the patent was attached a map. Later the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gurnsey v. Northern California Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Willis v. LauridsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Morton v. FolgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- St. Louis Street Flushing Mach. Co. v. Sanitary Street Flushing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Smith v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pinsky v. SloatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- City of Redlands v. NickersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Helms Bakeries v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Miller v. AtkinsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
- Speer v. BlaskerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961