Legal Opinion

Morton v. Folger

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1860PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Sixth District. The facts appear in the opinion of the Court. See, also, Ferris v. Ooover, 10 Cal. 589. The Court below nonsuited plaintiff, who appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtField, C. J.

Baldwin, J. and Cope, J. concurring.

This is an action of ejectment, to recover the possession of certain real estate, situated within the city of Sacramento. The plaintiff bases his right to recover upon the title of John A. Sutter, through whom he claims, by sundry mesne conveyances ; and, as evidence of that title, *277relies upon a grant to Sutter from the former Mexican Government, and Sutter’s prior possession of the premises in controversy. The defendants set up in defense, the several statutes of limitation, and title from Sutter, through conveyances from one Richards, under whom they…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ferris v. CooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Caufman v. Presbyterian Congregation of Cedar SpringSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1813
  3. Lessee of Montgomery v. DickeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1797

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sobey v. MolonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Zilmer v. GerichtenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Leonard v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Fulkerson v. Chisna Mining & Improvement Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
  5. Rompe v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API